.
.
.
.

Views

 

 

The use of AI in Law: How just is machine justice? The use of AI in Law: How just is machine justice? | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2018/04/AI-in-Law-How-just-is-machine-justice.aspxThe use of AI in Law: How just is machine justice? The use of AI in Law: How just is machine justice? | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#19/04/2018<p style="text-align:justify;">Artificial intelligence is a burning topic in many sectors today and the legal industry is no exception. Recently, at the <a href="https://www.worldservicesgroup.com/"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">World Services Group</span></a>'s annual <a href="/_layouts/15/FIXUPREDIRECT.ASPX?WebId=de941175-f8d4-4a41-8207-c9aec3e1e3b2&TermSetId=9c3dd502-4f62-4d66-9ef2-684258a8f9ed&TermId=b564dd75-3e90-490a-bc95-08e217bb2ecc"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">employment law</span></a> conference held in February, AI was heavily debated along with its' impact not only on the legal profession, lawyers, clients, the way business is done, but also our traditional understanding of concepts such as "law" or "justice". </p><p style="text-align:justify;">According to expert predictions, with current software developments and the rise of intelligent systems, in a few decades certain jobs will disappear – bank clerks, cash-register operators etc. It may be difficult to imagine, but it is actually not that far from reality.</p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Artificial intelligence and employment </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">Software is even now used by HR professionals in the recruitment process and in later stages – certain interviews are conducted with no humans present apart from the interviewee, with intelligent software asking the questions. Whether by the various backdoors or through the main gates, technology is replacing the human workforce. So, what are the consequences?</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Certain jobs that seem necessary now will become obsolete – what will happen to the people doing those jobs? If they would become redundant, the system would need to find them new jobs or enable them to re-qualify in a timely manner. However, there are many positive aspects to this – such as the development of new professions and industries. In a sense, even though some jobs will disappear, new ones will pop into existence to replace them. Of course that there will always be jobs that machines are not sophisticated enough to perform, that will always need a "human touch". On the other hand, when working in dangerous environments, machines clearly have the advantage.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Further, from an ethical viewpoint, the subject of discrimination in the relations between humans and their machine interviewers is quite interesting, especially in the recruitment process. Can we get accidentally discriminatory solutions based on the input "fed" to the programme on the acceptable candidate? Artificial intelligence still eventually requires humans to operate it and feed it information, so can a machine then really be more objective than a human?</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Other legal repercussions of the development of AI are quite substantial. If, for some reason or other, the machine fails to perform adequately, who is then to blame? Traditionally the one held responsible would be the user or the owner. Now, perhaps the one to blame is the developer that worked on that AI? </p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Due diligence software</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The legal profession is no exception to these developments. A growing number of international law firms use AI to conduct due diligences, partially or <em>in toto</em>. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">For example, in the most limited use of software for due diligence, the programme is given information from a virtual data room, and through a combination of key-words it eliminates unnecessary or irrelevant documentation. The next phase in more developed DD software includes the programme processing the relevant documentation through the recognition of certain word combinations or information, pairing it then with its' own legal terminology based on the laws and rulings that it was fed. The AI can also compare information, fill in parts of the report or assists in some other way. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Since most clients these days request a fast reaction and a due diligence more and more often needs to be conducted within few days, in order to speed things up and reduce costs, international law firms decide to use this this kind of software as it makes things a lot easier, since long and arduous work can be sometimes resolved in hours.</p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Online dispute resolution and AI judges</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">A topic which excites considerable discussion is the development of online <a href="/_layouts/15/FIXUPREDIRECT.ASPX?WebId=de941175-f8d4-4a41-8207-c9aec3e1e3b2&TermSetId=9c3dd502-4f62-4d66-9ef2-684258a8f9ed&TermId=2feca75c-4d2e-42e5-8d02-6e0db3809927"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">dispute resolution</span></a>. In cases when there is no need for hearings, and when disputes are handled through submissions, the current development of technology enables that submissions by the parties can be simply uploaded and read – after which a ruling can be reached, without the need for the physical presence of the parties before the authorities. Most courts are still not as advanced as to use this method, but there is a tendency to implement online submissions in some more flexible forms of arbitration or mediation. Technically it is a very small step to go from filing your submissions in hard copy to uploading them.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">This brings us to perhaps the most controversial application of AI in the legal industry – software passing judgements and rulings. The majority of lawyers would say that this is the last area that they would expect to be conducted via software. Most would say that this requires justice – a characteristically human concept. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">However, it may come as a surprise that a similar kind of software is being currently tested by some judges and professionals in EU as we speak. Most notably, this option is currently being considered for collective lawsuits, where numerous claims arise from the same factual background and the judges are actually copy-pasting their decisions in practice.AI can do this faster and more efficiently, saving the judges' time for more complex decision making. This appears to mark only the beginning of the silent AI revolution in the legal segment, since we may not be that far away from AI making decisions in other typical cases as well.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">An artificial intelligence judge has accurately predicted most verdicts of the <a href="https://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home">European Court of Human Rights</a>. Scientists built AI that was able to look at legal evidence and asses its ethical questions to decide how a case should be decided. And it predicted those with 79 per cent accuracy, according to its creators. The algorithm looked at data sets made up 584 cases relating to torture and degrading treatment, fair trials and privacy. The computer was able to look through that information and make its own decision – which lined up with those made by Europe's most senior judges in almost every case.</p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Paradigm shift</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">Would such a use of AI make law more neutral and unbiased? Is justice dealt out by a machine is more objective than human justice? Of course, this relates to the question of whether we want law to be objective in such a way or do we want to look at the specific circumstances of each unique case from a human perspective? Then again, some would argue against AI objectivity by pointing out that humans feed it information so that it can never reach the ultimately objective approach.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The idea is that we still need to feed the software with court rulings, precedent law and information from which it would develop syllogisms, reach decisions and propose further actions. So, while inputting information, certain discriminatory ideas could be included accidentally, allowing for discriminatory rulings. According to some researchers, for example, republican judges are more inclined towards stricter punishments than their more liberal counterparts. Also, according to simple statistics, judges reach harsher verdicts before lunch than after. And, as much as judges try to be objective, there are indications that courts are generally more forgiving towards women or more inclined to provide them with certain rights – especially mothers. So, despite our attempts at neutrality, certain patterns emerge, given a large enough sample, that the AI can pick up and continue with in its decision making process.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">So, will machine justice be more just than human justice? And if so, would we want such a thing?</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The AI judge in our example was wrong in around 20 per cent of rulings – its logic and conclusions were mostly correct, similar to those of its human counterparts. Taking that into consideration and given the cost-effectiveness of the use of software as opposed to using human lawyers – the final word could be left to the clients. Whether to hire lawyers or to opt for the more affordable solution, even though not ideally just. </p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Conclusion</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">Until recently, the legal profession was much the same as it was two thousand years ago. From the times of Ancient Rome, we have had the prosecution, the defence and arbiters that consider the arguments and then pass judgements. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">We are witnessing now a paradigm shift – the ideas of law and justice are being reconsidered. How we adapt to emerging technologies, new client expectations and industry trends will determine the place of lawyers in this brave, new world.</p><p>​</p>
Interview with Patricia Gannon: The Importance of Female Leadership in Law Today Interview with Patricia Gannon: The Importance of Female Leadership in Law Today | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2018/03/Interview-Patricia-Gannon-Female-Leadership-Law.aspxInterview with Patricia Gannon: The Importance of Female Leadership in Law Today Interview with Patricia Gannon: The Importance of Female Leadership in Law Today | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#28/03/2018<p style="text-align:justify;">​<a href="/_layouts/15/FIXUPREDIRECT.ASPX?WebId=de941175-f8d4-4a41-8207-c9aec3e1e3b2&TermSetId=9c3dd502-4f62-4d66-9ef2-684258a8f9ed&TermId=f616689d-b764-4295-8508-2e08c1cc7e9e"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Patricia Gannon</span></a>, founding partner at Karanović & Nikolić, was recently appointed Chair of the European Forum at the <a href="https://www.ibanet.org/"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">International Bar Association</span></a>. In this interview, she discusses her role at the helm of the largest global gathering of legal professionals and tackles the important topic of diversity in law, as well as female leadership from her unique perspective as female co-founder of a leading law firm from Southeast Europe. </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">You have recently been appointed to the role of Chair of the European Forum at the IBA. What does this important position entail? </span></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong class="ms-rteStyle-IntenseQuote">Patricia</strong><strong class="ms-rteStyle-IntenseQuote">:</strong> As a firm, Karanović & Nikolić has been heavily involved with the IBA since our foundation. In particular, I have personally been active in a number of committees over the years as they represent a great way to stay on top of professional change. Most recently, the European Regional Forum, which is the forum responsible for managing and organizing all of the IBA conferences and events throughout Europe. The Forum is made up of 9,000 individual lawyer members and is the largest Forum within the IBA.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">I have served as an officer for the last 5 years – culminating in a number of years of practical experience involving conference and event organizing. Today, there are 10 officers reporting in from different law firms all over Europe, we also have an advisory board of 25 senior lawyers, and approximately 50 council members representing every country in Europe. The council members are responsible for liaising between the European Forum and their own countries. </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">What do you feel that you bring to that role and what are your aims and hopes for the year?</strong></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong class="ms-rteStyle-IntenseQuote">Patricia:</strong><span class="ms-rteStyle-Normal"> </span>I bring a certain dynamic to the role which hasn't always been seen and I am keen to innovate a little more in order to move the IBA towards becoming a more modern organization, really reflecting the changes in the legal profession. This year, in addition to running the normal day-to-day conferences, we are looking for special funding from the IBA for a number of exiting projects. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">One of them includes a review of the UK Modern Slavery Act on production and supply chain in the fashion industry. We hope to come to an understanding on the impact of extraterritorial legislation on corporates operating in this field. This is an exciting project which is relevant to consumers everywhere, as they are increasingly concerned about the human and environmental impact of clothes production.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">I am working on a very exciting meeting in Rome – it is the Annual Meeting of the IBA scheduled for October, and it will include a number of very exciting sessions dealing with the hottest legal topics in the world. The ERF sessions include "Remaking Rome – the Treaty of Rome and what Europe Needs Now".</p><p style="text-align:justify;">We will be working with other committees in a session on European luxury brands titled "Do you know where your clothes come from?". There will also be a session organized by all fora titled "The Future of Food – a Global Issue for Humanity", where we look at legal and policy issues relating to food production, resources, packaging, regulation, genetically modified content etc. </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">You are interested in the IBA diversity group. Will this relate to your role as the Chair of the European Forum?</strong></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong class="ms-rteStyle-IntenseQuote">Patricia:</strong> Global membership in the IBA today is about 70 percent male and 30 percent female – which is not entirely in recognition of the make-up of the profession generally. In certain countries it is almost 50-50, and this is including the judiciary, prosecutors, house-counsel, solicitors and barristers. Different parts of the profession are more female than others. Overall, considering the 70-30 percent membership, I feel that the 30 percent has not historically been represented appropriately throughout the organization and, in fact, a special task force is being established within the IBA to deal with diversity in general, including gender. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">In my role as Chair of the European Forum, I made it my priority at one of my first meetings to ensure that 50 percent of all the representatives in my Council are female. I am very pleased to say that today 47 percent of the Council members are female. As a result of that, I expect to see a new dynamic with greater productivity and focus. Out of that pool of talented women, I hope to see more and more of them promoted across the ranks of the IBA. It's a process of change which the legal profession, as any other needs to address.</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">It must be interesting, not only being a woman, but also representing a law firm from this part of Europe?</strong></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><strong class="ms-rteStyle-IntenseQuote">Patricia:</strong> Yes, indeed! The IBA has relatively low membership numbers from Southeast Europe, and I hope that raising the organization's profile in SEE will raise membership and that we will get more active and learn from our colleagues both from Western Europe and across the globe. With that in mind, I will be opening the Balkan Legal Forum – our traditional bi-annual conference dealing with this region – which is to be held in Vienna on the 14th of June. I am very pleased to be involved in this highly relevant conference for all practitioners working in Southeast Europe. With approximately 150 attendees, it is the perfect opportunity to meet old friends who understand the complexity of doing business in the Balkans, making new connections and developing new ideas for investment opportunities. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">As for Karanović & Nikolić and its role, we have been a corporate member of the International Bar Association for many years – which means that all the lawyers working with us are individual members of the IBA and can participate in its activities and learn from their peers through committee work. As a firm, we are keen to support all the organizations where lawyers can learn, develop and be in touch with current best practices, albeit from other markets. I think that we in Southeast Europe have some catching up to do in terms of the levels of professionalism that we need to provide to our international clients. The IBA is a great instrument for our further professional evolution.</p>
New Amendments to Serbian Tax Laws New Amendments to Serbian Tax Laws | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2018/01/New-Amendments-to-Serbian-Tax-Laws.aspxNew Amendments to Serbian Tax Laws New Amendments to Serbian Tax Laws | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#01/02/2018<p style="text-align:justify;">At the end of 2017, the <a href="http://www.parlament.gov.rs/national-assembly.467.html"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">Serbian Parliament</span></a> passed amendments to Serbian tax laws, including the Law on Personal Income Tax (PIT Law), the Law on Contributions on Mandatory Social Insurance (CMSI Law), the Law on Corporate Income Tax (CIT Law), and the Law on Value Added Tax (VAT Law). </p><p style="text-align:justify;">These amendments introduce tax relief for salaries paid to employees in newly incorporated legal entities. Also, starting from April 2018, only service fees for business advisory services paid to non-resident legal entities will be subject to withholding tax, as opposed to all service fees paid to non-resident legal entities, as prescribed in the current CIT Law. In addition, Serbia continues to reduce the tax burden related to NPL write-offs.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The amendments are generally effective as of 1 January 2018, with some exceptions explained below.</p><h1 style="text-align:left;">Income tax and social security contributions </h1><p style="text-align:justify;">Under the amendments to the PIT Law and the CMSI Law, salaries paid to first nine employees as well as to the employed shareholders and entrepreneurs, will be fully exempted from salary tax and social security contributions. The exemptions will start to apply from 1 October 2018 and shall be applicable for salaries paid by entrepreneurs and legal entities that are established before 31 December 2020. Salaries will be exempted from tax for the first 12 months of employment.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Although the introduced relief will be of significance for small start-up companies, it is unclear whether the employees will be mandatory insured during the period of exemption since contributions for pension and disability, as well as for health insurance, will not be paid. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">A collective life insurance premium – which is paid for all employees, as well as monetary support for the purpose of employee medical treatment is exempted from taxation and the payment of social contributions. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Under the amendments, the write-off of the NPLs is not subject to personal income tax as long as such a write-off is deductible for corporate income tax purposes. Also, it is prescribed that the amount of the write-off that was not collected after the sale of mortgaged real property is not subject to tax. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The position of non-resident individuals is also tackled in the recent changes in the Serbian legislation. Amendments to the PIT Law clarify that the taxable income of non-residents covers income from work done in Serbia, as well as income generated from (i) any right emerging on the territory of Serbia, or (ii) any property which is located in Serbia and which is at the disposal of a non-resident. In addition, it is now clearly prescribed that foreign employees seconded to Serbia (i.e. expatriates) are liable to pay salary tax for work done in Serbia.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The PIT Law and the CMSI Law prescribe new thresholds for tax payments and contributions in 2018 as follows:</p><ul style="text-align:justify;"><li>the general monthly salary tax deduction is increased to app. EUR 130 (RSD 15.000), from existing app. EUR 100 (RSD 11.790);</li><li>the minimal monthly contributions base is set to a gross amount of app. EUR 200 (RSD 23,053); and,</li><li>the highest annual contributions base for 2018 is set to a gross amount of app. EUR 2.700 (RSD 329,330).</li></ul><h1 style="text-align:justify;">Law on corporate income tax </h1><p style="text-align:justify;">The amendments to the CIT Law narrowed the list of service fees that are subject to the withholding tax. Serbian resident legal entities will have to pay withholding tax only for service fees paid to non-residents providing market research, accounting, auditing and other legal and business consulting services, irrespectively to the place of the provision or usage of those services. Also, the deadline for the payment of withholding tax is extended, so that one has to pay the tax within 3 days after paying the non-resident's fee. The amendments related to withholding tax are effective from 1 April 2018. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Amendments concerning depreciation specify that fixed assets which are comprised out of immovable and movable parts should be classified in tax depreciation groups – which corresponds to the classification made for accounting purposes. Intangible assets (concessions, patents, licences...) will be depreciated using the proportional, instead of the declining method.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Further to the decision of the <a href="https://www.nbs.rs/internet/cirilica/index.html"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">National Bank of Serbia</span></a> (NBS) issued earlier in 2017 and which prescribes that NPLs should be written-off by the banks and evidenced off-balance, the amendments to the CIT Law prescribe that the expenses recorded by the bank, as a consequence of the write-off, are deductible for CIT purposes. These amendments are already applicable to the assessment of CIT for 2017.</p><h1 style="text-align:justify;">Law on value added tax</h1><p style="text-align:justify;">The main change introduced by the amendments to the VAT Law is related to concession agreements and public-private partnership agreements. Based on the amendments, any supply made between a concessionaire and the provider of the concession are not regarded as supply for VAT purposes, and therefore are not subject to VAT under certain conditions. This exception applies if both parties are registered VAT payers and if they would be entitled to a deduction of input VAT in case that the regular supply is carried. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">An important amendment introduces the possibility for VAT payers to reduce their output VAT if the tax authority determines that there was a misapplication of the "reverse charge" calculation. If the tax authority denies the deduction of input VAT to the taxpayer that applied the "reverse charge", the taxpayer may also reduce its output VAT on the basis of such the tax resolution. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">In order to align Serbian VAT rules with the VAT rules in the EU, amendments to the VAT Law introduce rules on the VAT treatment for the supply of "investment gold". Generally, the supply of investment gold and intermediation in the supply of investment gold are exempted from VAT.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Amendments also relate to the VAT position of individuals. It is prescribed that individuals are entitled to a VAT refund paid when purchasing one's first apartment, in cases when the purchase price was paid to a bank account other than the bank account of the seller, as well as when the apartment is under mortgage or when the apartment is purchased in enforcement proceedings. Also, the supply of goods to travellers that do not have a permanent or temporary address in Serbia (not only supplies to foreign citizens) is exempted from VAT, if the value of the goods exceeds EUR 100.   </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span class="ms-rteStyle-Quote"><em>The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></span></p><p>​</p>
Amendments to the Slovenian Construction Law Amendments to the Slovenian Construction Law | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2018/01/Amendments-to-the-Slovenian-Construction-Law.aspxAmendments to the Slovenian Construction Law Amendments to the Slovenian Construction Law | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#24/01/2018<p style="text-align:justify;">With the aim of breathing a bit of fresh air into the Slovenian construction legislation, three new laws have been adopted recently and will be applied with effect from 1 July 2018. The current Construction Act will be replaced with both the new Building Act and the Architectural and Civil Engineering Activities Act, while the current Spatial Management Act will also be subject to certain amendments. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Slovenian construction legislation went through several major changes due to its complicated and unclear nature. The previous law required broad project documentation, meaning very high expenses and long procedures for obtaining building permits. The new Building Act thus simplifies the procedure and brings many novelties, especially for investors to the procedure itself, with pre-decision being one of the most important ones. Apart from that, the Building Act does not require building permits for simple and temporary buildings. They also become unnecessary for building maintenance and demolition purposes, in which case only the demolition of the building should be registered with the administrative unit 8 days before the demolition starts. The Building Act further broadens the definition of "building" to the physical, construction and similar structural changes. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Apart from the above, the Building Act brings the procedure of obtaining building permits and the procedure of obtaining environmental approval – where the latter is a requirement for the building permit, into the so called "integral procedure". According to the Building Act, only one body based on one document shall decide on both the building permit and environmental approval, while a special role is assigned to the general public, which will have an opportunity to review the documentation and submit comments and suggestions. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">One of the main novelties that the Building Act brings, in relation to the renewed procedure on obtaining the building permit, is the reduction of documentation that has to be submitted in order to obtain the building permit. The requested documentation is still to be defined in further regulations that will be adopted after the Building Act is applied. In order to simplify the procedure further, administrative units will have a more important role - being obliged to provide investors with non-binding information and advice. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Investors will now have the possibility of requesting the administrative unit to issue a pre-decision in relation to the compliance of the project with the spatial planning documents and other construction law provisions. Investors will still be obliged to submit detailed project documentation alongside with the request for a pre-decision. However, investors will not be obliged to prove the ownership right or the right to build on land for the issuance of the pre-decision. The pre-decision will provide legal security and investment predictability for the investor, as the administrative unit will issue the opinion on the admissibility of construction even before the administrative unit issues the building permit and the investor obtains ownership over the land. The pre-decision will also be binding for the administrative unit when issuing the building permit itself, and will thus prevent spatial planning documents to be subsequently amended. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Building Act will also simplify the procedure of obtaining the building permit by amending the procedures on obtaining consent from the competent authorities. The Building Act thus abolishes consent (<em><strong>Slovene soglasja</strong></em>) and instead implements opinions<strong> </strong>(<em><strong>Slovene mnenje</strong></em>)<strong> </strong>by the authorities competent for granting the opinions (<em><strong>Slovene mnenjedajalec</strong></em>). In cases when the opinion authority will not issue the opinion, or the opinions are inconsistent or exceed the legal grounds, the administrative unit will be entitled to organise an oral hearing in order to harmonise opinions, and even decide on the opinion itself. If the opinion authorities will not issue an opinion during the given deadline, its' opinion may be substituted with the opinion of the authority supervising the opinion authority, or by the opinion of an expert.  </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Building Act further implements broader conditions for the use of the short fact-finding procedure, which will be carried out for all buildings, if the project documentation is submitted together with the building designer's or project manager's confirmation on the fulfilment of the essential conditions, positive opinions of the opinion authorities, notices by third-party participants, and the confirmation on the payment of the communal fee or the compensation for degradation and usurpation. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Also, certain changes will be implemented concerning the registration for the commencement of the construction. Instead of registration with the Labour inspectorate 15 days in advance, the investor will be obliged to register the commencement of construction with the administrative unit 8 days before the construction begins. The registration shall be submitted electronically or by form – which is still to be prescribed by the <a href="http://www.vlada.si/en/about_the_government/ministries/ministry_of_the_environment_and_spatial_planning/"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">Ministry of the environment and spatial planning</span></a>. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Building Act also amends the legalisation procedures for existing buildings, aiming to solve past problems. It will be thus possible to legalise all buildings with deviations, which will be acceptable under the Building Act, as well as those buildings, which comply either with the Building Act or with the act which was in use during the construction time. The latter can be carried out 5 years after the Building Act enters into force. Further, all buildings, built prior to 1 January 1998, whose purpose and scale remained the same, can become legal. In those cases, permissions for long-existing buildings will be issued. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Apart from the above, all procedures will be simplified by submitting the requests and documents via the electronic spatial information system, providing for the simple obtaining of permissions and faster communication between the authorities and parties in the procedures. The electronic system is planned to be implemented by 2021.</p><p style="text-align:left;"> </p><p style="text-align:left;"> </p><p style="text-align:left;"><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></p>
New Rules on the Private Enforcement of Competition Laws in Slovenia New Rules on the Private Enforcement of Competition Laws in Slovenia | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/12/New-Rules-on-the-Private-Enforcement-of-Competition-Laws-in-Slovenia.aspxNew Rules on the Private Enforcement of Competition Laws in Slovenia New Rules on the Private Enforcement of Competition Laws in Slovenia | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#08/12/2017<p>After some delay, Slovenia finally adopted the new amendment to the Prevention of Restriction of Competition Act ("Competition Act"), which implements the Directive 2014/104/EU ("Directive") on actions for damages for infringements of the competition law. </p><p>While the Directive stated that member states should bring into force national regulations to implement it by December 2016, the amendment was adopted by the <a href="https://www.dz-rs.si/wps/portal/en/Home">National Assembly</a> on the 25th of April, 2017, and it came into effect on the 20th of May, 2017.</p><div style="text-align:justify;"> </div><p style="text-align:justify;">Up until now, compensation claims were scarcely regulated by the Competition Act. General rules of the law of obligations and civil procedure applied - apart from specific regulation of the statute of limitations, and some provisions regarding the interaction between the courts and the national competition authorities and the <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/index_en">European Commission</a>.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">In order for the Directive to be implemented, 16 new articles were added to the Competition Act, and a couple more were amended. Still, the use of general rules of the law of obligations and civil procedure apply, however, there are a lot of new, specific rules which govern both procedural and substantive aspects of compensation claims. The outline of such novelties is presented below.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">The disclosure of evidence and handling of confidential information</h3><p style="text-align:justify;">The new provisions regulate in detail the rights and obligations of the parties, as well as third persons with regard to the disclosure of evidence. With the exception of leniency statements and settlement submissions – the disclosure of which is not permitted, parties may request access to the relevant evidence. A special concern is given to the protection of business secrets and other confidential information, where certain measures may be undertaken in order to ensure protection of such information.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Taking into account the principles of necessity and proportionality, both the injured party and the infringer may request that the evidence is disclosed by the opposing party or third parties, including public authorities (such as the national competition authorities). If the party does not comply with its obligation to disclose the evidence, the court will decide on the legal costs at its discretion. Whereas, if the third party refuses to do so, the court's decision on the disclosure of evidence may be enforced in accordance with the rules governing the execution proceedings.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">The effect of the national competition authorities' final decisions </h3><p style="text-align:justify;">In addition to the court being bound by a final decision of the <a href="http://www.varstvo-konkurence.si/en/">Slovenian Competition Protection Agency</a> ("Agency"), the Competition Act now also stipulates that in case that the final infringement decision was adopted by a national competition authority of another EU member state, such a final decision generates an assumption that an infringement of competition law has indeed occurred, whereas counter-evidence is admissible.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">Joint and several liability of the infringers</h3><p style="text-align:justify;">Joint and several liability of the infringers, which is provided for by the Directive, is a general rule under the Slovenian law of obligations. The new amendment therefore brings into force only specific provisions regarding (i) infringers who are small or medium-sized companies, and (ii) infringers that received immunity from a payment of a fine.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">An infringer, with less than 250 employees and an annual turnover less than 50 million euros or 43 million euros of total assets, is liable only to its own direct and indirect purchasers, if its market share is below 5% and joint and several liability would inflict economic damage on it and cause its assets to lose all their value. Notwithstanding, such an infringer remains jointly and severally liable to other injured parties if they cannot obtain full compensation from the other infringers. Infringers, who compelled other companies to take part in the breach of competition laws or against whom a final court or administrative decision on the breach of competition laws was already issued, also remain jointly and severally liable to all injured parties.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Joint and several liability of the infringer that received an immunity from fines, is limited to the amount of damages caused by this infringer to its own direct and indirect purchasers or suppliers.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Another novelty is that the injured party who concluded the settlement with one of the infringers may claim damages from the rest of the infringers, but only up to the amount reduced for the co-infringer's share of the harm. Notwithstanding, the injured party may claim the reduced amount also from the infringer, with whom it concluded the settlement, if the other infringers are not able to reimburse the injured party and unless it was agreed in the settlement that such claim is not admissible.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">The Statute of Limitations</h3><p style="text-align:justify;">The period of limitation of actions for damages is five years (it was previously three years) from the moment the injured party becomes aware, or could be reasonably expected to become aware, of (i) breach of competition laws, (ii) damages incurred due to breach, and (iii) the infringer, whereas the action cannot be brought before the court after ten years (previously five years) from the moment damages had incurred. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the limitation period does not start to run before the breach of competition laws has ceased.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">Quantification of harm</h3><p style="text-align:justify;">The quantification of damages, often a tough nut to crack due to complex issues which have to be taken into consideration, is now expected to be facilitated by rules brought into force by the amendment. When the court is determining the amount of damages at its discretion in accordance with the general rules of civil procedure, it is now authorised to take into account the profit the infringer gained by the breach of competition laws. Moreover, a legal presumption that cartels cause harm is now in force, shifting the burden to prove otherwise to the infringer. The court can also ask the Agency or the national competition authority of another EU member state to give their opinion on the quantification of damages.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">The passing-on of overcharges and indirect purchasers</h3><p style="text-align:justify;">According to the amendment, the amount of the overcharge presents actual loss and while full compensation should be reached, it should not exceed the said amount. The infringer may invoke a passing-on defence, proving the overcharge was – in whole or in part – transferred to the next level of the supply chain. It has to be noted though, that in case the injured party passed-on the overcharge and it resulted in a decline of sales or purchases, it should be entitled to damages for loss of profit.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">If the indirect purchaser brings an action for damages, the claimant bears the burden of proving that an overcharge was passed-on to him. The amendment alleviates the claimant's onerous duty by introducing a legal presumption that the overcharges have indeed been passed-on to the claimant, if the claimant succeeds in proving that (i) the defendant breached competition laws, (ii) passing-on of overcharges to the claimant was a result of that breach, and (iii) the claimant purchased goods or services, that were the object of the breach. This legal presumption is rebuttable if the defendant can prove that the overcharge was not, or at least not in its entirety, passed on to the indirect purchaser.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">Consensual dispute resolution</h3><p style="text-align:justify;">If the parties consent to an alternative dispute resolution procedure, the court proceedings may be suspended for up to two years. Such a provision encourages the parties to reach an out-of-court agreement even though the court proceedings have already started.</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">What all of this really means?</h3><p style="text-align:justify;">More claimant-friendly regulation, as well as adjustments of the compensation claims to specifics of competition law, are hoped to increase the number of private antitrust litigation cases throughout the EU member states. The idea of the Directive and the new amendment to the Competition Act is to raise the incentives for private damage claims and thus bring together, and ensure an effective combination of both public and private enforcement - since only the combination of both will ensure the full effectiveness of competition law.</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote"></em> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify;">​</p>
The New Serbian Competition Law – Emerging Europe Interview with Rastko Petaković The New Serbian Competition Law – Emerging Europe Interview with Rastko Petaković | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/11/New-Serbian-Competition-Law–Emerging-Europe-Interview-with-Rastko-Petaković.aspxThe New Serbian Competition Law – Emerging Europe Interview with Rastko Petaković The New Serbian Competition Law – Emerging Europe Interview with Rastko Petaković | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#07/11/2017<p style="text-align:justify;">The interview with Rastko Petaković was published in November 2017, by Emerging Europe. To see the original article, please follow this <a href="http://emerging-europe.com/regions/serbia-drafts-new-competition-law/"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">link</span></a>.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Serbian <a href="http://mtt.gov.rs/en/"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications</span></a>, together with the country's Competition Commission, has begun to draft new competition legislation, in order to improve the business environment.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">"The idea came from the competition authority, as it felt some changes might improve enforcement of the law and clarify some of the legal ambiguities to ensure the Serbian antitrust regime is further harmonised with that of the EU," explains Rastko Petaković, managing partner at Karanović and Nikolić, which will contribute to the new law.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">"A more immediate trigger however came from the changes to the law governing administrative procedure; in June this year, changes to the general rules on administrative procedure came into effect, some of which could also affect antitrust related procedures. To avoid ambiguities as to the application of general rules (governing general administrative procedures) vs. specific rules (governing special administrative procedure in antitrust cases), the authority wanted to speed up the process," he tells <em>Emerging Europe</em>.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">According to the President of the <a href="http://www.kzk.org.rs/en"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">Competition Commission</span></a>, Miloje Obradović, the new law will help better protect market competition, facilitating a more effective use of existing resources and offer better and higher quality products to consumers.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">"As long as the business community knows what to expect in interpretation, application and enforcement of the law, it will see the local legal framework as predictable and easier for doing business. As long as the antitrust law is EU based and predictable enough, it should reduce the risk of doing business in Serbia," Mr Petaković adds.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">"As to more specific changes, the new law is expected to increase merger filing thresholds which may reduce the number of filings being made in Serbia each year. It is also expected to bring more clarity and better align the regime with EU secondary regulation relating to restrictive agreements. Consequently, it should allow for more flexibility in setting up more flexible distribution structures," he says.</p><p style="text-align:left;"> </p><p style="text-align:left;"> </p><p style="text-align:left;"><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></p><p>​</p>
Favouring Slovenian Origin is Contrary to EU Law Favouring Slovenian Origin is Contrary to EU Law | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/11/Favouring-Slovenian-Origin-is-Contrary-to-EU-Law.aspxFavouring Slovenian Origin is Contrary to EU Law Favouring Slovenian Origin is Contrary to EU Law | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#03/11/2017<p style="text-align:justify;">On the 8th of June, 2017, the <a href="https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies/court-justice_en"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">Court of Justice of the European Union</span></a> (CJEU) reached an important decision in the case Medisanus d.o.o. v General Hospital Murska Sobota (C-296/15) concerning public procurement procedures. The judgement is relevant from both the procedural aspect - since the National Review Commission (DKOM) was acknowledged for the first time as a "national court" for the purposes of Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as well as from the substantive point of view – due to the emphasis on the principle of equal treatment and the prohibition of discrimination within public procurement procedures. </p><h2>Disputed Public Procurement </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">General Hospital Murska Sobota reached a decision, on public procurement in 2015, concerning the purchase of two types of drugs derived from plasma. The tender documentation specified as a technical prerequisite that these drugs have to be obtained from Slovenian plasma. This prerequisite was included in the tender documentation based on the provision of the Law on Medicinal Products, which stipulates that supplies must come as a matter of priority from medicinal products manufactured from plasma collected in Slovenia. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">According to the opinion of the contracting authority, this should not be contravening EU primary law, since deviation from Article 34 of TFEU may be justified on the grounds of public health protection. Consequently, such a provision of the Law on Medicinal Products contributes to the national self-sufficiency by encouraging Slovenian citizens to make voluntary blood donations. The only contractor that could fulfil such a prerequisite was the <a href="http://www.ztm.si/en/"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">Institute for Transfusion Medicine of the Republic of Slovenia</span></a>. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The company <a href="http://www.medisanus.com/"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">Medisanus d.o.o.</span></a>, which was offering drugs of the same type but from foreign plasma, after the rejection of its tender application, challenged the decision before DKOM. The procedure was subsequently stalled by the DKOM, since it made a request for a preliminary ruling before the CJEU. Namely, whether the request for a plasma of Slovenian origin is in accordance with the Public Procurement Directive.</p><h2>DKOM is Entitled to Request a Preliminary Ruling before the CJEU </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">For the first time in DKOM's existence, the CJEU had the opportunity to assess whether the DKOM could be considered as the "national court" for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU. Considering the established case law on similar national revision bodies in member states, the CJEU ruled that the DKOM fulfils all relevant criteria for the obtainment of such status which entitles the DKOM to request preliminary rulings. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The DKOM has, namely, no connection with contracting authorities whose decisions it reviews, its members enjoy the same safeguards as judges in relation to their appointment, term of office and the grounds for removal. Its members are, furthermore, independent and the jurisdiction of the DKOM is mandatory and permanent. Also, the DKOM is established pursuant to a special law and the procedure is <em>inter partes</em>. </p><h2>Prerequisite on the National Origin of Plasma is Contrary to EU Law </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The CJEU established that the drugs derived from human blood or plasma are "goods" in terms of Article 34 TFEU, and are as well "products" under the Public Procurement Directive. CJEU furthermore states that the prerequisite for a national origin falls under the scope of Article 34 TFEU, which prohibits obstacles to the free movement of goods. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">This prohibition covers both the quantitative restrictions, as well as measures that are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly and actually or potentially, imports between member states. This prohibits all discriminatory practices that limit the free movement of goods within the EU. The paramount conclusion of the CJEU is that the prerequisite on national origin of plasma is discriminatory per se, since it does not allow companies that collect plasma from other countries to successfully participate in the tender procedures. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">It is true that the Public Procurement Directive itself enabled references to certain origin, however only if this is justified by the subject matter of the procurement and such reference is only exceptional. It also derives from the CJEU case law that in such cases a specific source stated in the tender documentation has to be accompanied by the words "or equivalent" in order for the tender to be in compliance with EU law. There was no such wording in the case at hand. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Pursuant to the fact that it is possible to deviate from the principle of the free movement of goods in certain exceptional cases, the CJEU deliberated whether such deviation is justified. The sole reason for justification could only be based on the grounds of public health protection. The CJEU did note that the prerequisite for a national origin of plasma pursues a legitimate objective. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">However, the priority principle for medicinal products manufactured industrially from Slovenian plasma does not contribute decisively to encouraging the Slovenian population to make voluntary blood donations. Thus, the CJEU held that the priority principle is disproportionate. </p><h2>Conclusion </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The most important conclusion for the practice on public procurements will be the fact that neither the Public Procurement Directive nor the primary EU law forbid tender documentation provisions which would require that drugs are derived from Slovenian plasma, even if national legislation requires such a provision. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">A decision like that, which further limits the scope of potential deviations from the free movement of goods, will be beneficial for public procurement procedures, since such practices are not uncommon. In light of enhancing the professionalism of the DKOM, the decision on admissibility of its request should be welcomed. Thus, we can anticipate further activity from parties which will surely more often propose to DKOM to request preliminary ruling in cases where ambiguous legal provisions are at play.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></p><p>​</p>
Slovenia Adopts Class Action Law Slovenia Adopts Class Action Law | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/10/Slovenia-Adopts-Class-Action-Law.aspxSlovenia Adopts Class Action Law Slovenia Adopts Class Action Law | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#13/10/2017<p style="text-align:justify;">The <a href="http://www.dz-rs.si/wps/portal/Home/"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">Slovenian National Assembly</span></a> adopted the Class Action Law, which will implement an important institute to the Slovenian legal system, i.e. mechanism of class action. This mechanism is already applied in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands and Sweden, but is yet to be implemented in numerous EU member states. The new mechanism of class action will provide for the injured parties, both natural and legal persons, to file a compensation claim in case of mass harm situations. Besides a collective action for compensation, the law also provides for the possibility to file a collective action for the cessation of illegal behaviour against the infringers, as well as the procedure of collective settlement in case of mass harm events. The law will come into force on the 21<sup>st</sup> of October, 2017, while it will apply with effect from the 21<sup>st</sup> of April, 2018.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The law regulates procedures for collective redress in cases when the infringer breached consumers' or workers' rights, as well as rights arising from the prohibition on the restriction of competition, or rights from the financial instruments market, and in cases of damage caused by environmental accidents. The law aims to offer solutions for numerous cases of harm mass situations, in which individuals, injured by the same infringer's act, did not seek judicial protection mainly due to the high cost and low amount of individual claims for compensation. Apart from providing for easier access to the court protection, the law also aims to stop and prohibit infringers from carrying out illegal behaviour by providing the possibility to file a collective action for the cessation of illegal behaviour against the infringers.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Court procedure under the new law can be commenced by the senior state attorney or by the private-law legal person, the activity of which is non-profit and is related to the breached right, wherein the court will assess in each case individually whether the above mentioned person is representative to start the procedure or not. An exception regarding the commencement of the court procedure applies to the consumer disputes, in which an the action for cessation of illegal behaviour of the breaching companies can be submitted only by the <a href="http://www.beuc.eu/beuc-network/members/zveza-potrosnikov-slovenije-zps"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">Slovenian Consumers' Association</span></a>, chamber, or association of companies of which the breaching company is a member. In case the company with its seat located in Slovenia breaches the rights of consumers, coming from any other European Union member state, an action against the Slovenian company can be also submitted by the organisation, established for the protection of consumers' rights under that EU member state.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Even though the injured party will not be party to the court procedures, governed by the new law, the injured party will nevertheless have the possibility to submit comments during the procedure. After the court procedure is finished, the infringer will pay the notional amount, whether directly to the injured parties, or to the notary public, who will act as a fiduciary of the compensation in certain cases. The law also introduces a public registry of class actions, where everyone will be able to access certain documents within the individual procedures free of charge.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The aim of the new law is therefore to provide for the easier enforcement of the right to compensation to injured individuals and legal persons, while the breaching companies can also be prohibited from carrying out illegal behaviour in the future. On the other hand, the law also provides for the safeguards against abusing such court procedures by regulating the procedure, based on which the court will first - after preliminary assessing the admissibility and completeness of the action - assess whether the requirements for approval of the action exist, while only after that it will proceed with deciding on the claim. It is also important to note that it will be possible to commence a procedure under the new law in relation to the mass harm situations which occur before the new law comes into force, if the claim for compensation is not statute-barred.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></p><p>​</p>
A New Concessions Act Passed in Croatia A New Concessions Act Passed in Croatia | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/10/A-New-Concessions-Act-Passed-in-Croatia.aspxA New Concessions Act Passed in Croatia A New Concessions Act Passed in Croatia | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#06/10/2017<p style="text-align:justify;">The New Croatian Concessions Act entered into force on the 14<sup>th</sup> of July, 2017. Those already involved in the pending concession granting procedures do not have to worry about legal instability because the application of the Old Concessions Act will continue for procedures that were initiated earlier. </p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Much Ado about Nothing </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The entire Croatian public rose to their feet when the motion of the New Concessions Act was published, motivated primarily by the <a href="https://www.total-croatia-news.com/business/18346-prime-minister-orders-review-of-zlatni-rat-concession-decision"><span lang="EN-GB" style="text-decoration:underline;">"Zlatni Rat" affair</span></a>, which took place in April, 2017. The Split-Dalmatia County granted a concession for one of the most attractive beaches on the Adriatic to a dubious company, in the procedure which was later annulled by the Ministry of Administration. This event drew the public's attention to the passing of the New Concessions Act, causing protestations from several NGOs. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">In fact, the novelties are mostly oriented on improving the technical aspects of the procedure, improving efficiency and accelerating the procedure, while several material aspects remain unchanged, especially those related to the maritime domain.</p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Reasons for Exclusion </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The New Concessions Act provides a number of facts, as reasons for the exclusion of a potential concessionaire, i.e.: </p><ol style="text-align:justify;"><li>breaches of labour, environmental and social regulations; </li><li>an on-going bankruptcy procedure; </li><li>the potential concessionaire committed a severe professional breach, bringing into question his integrity;</li><li>conviction for a criminal deed, which was committed conducting business activities; </li><li>cartel-like behaviour; and,</li><li>a previous concession agreement concluded with the respective entity terminated, or the potential concessionaire had to pay damages due to its defaults. </li></ol><p style="text-align:justify;">It is important to note that these reasons must be published in the tender documents, if the concession provider wishes to apply them in the respective procedure. However, the reasons under a) and c) seem very broad and quite vague. In fact, it is left for the concession provider to adjudicate which professional omissions or environmental breaches are severe enough to qualify for exclusion. It remains to be seen if the respective provision will result in any abuses, as such ambiguities usually do. </p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Pledge over Concessions</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">A lot of noise was raised in the general public concerning the possibility of the concessionaire to pledge its concession right in favour of the financial institution. However, the solution to this issue remained unchanged in comparison with the Old Concessions Act. So, the concession right may be subject to a pledge in favour of the financial institution (exclusively), if the consent of the concession provider is obtained. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Further, the financial institution may exercise its right as pledgee, by transferring the concession right to another entity. In such case, consent by the concession provider should be obtained, and the new entity entering the legal relation is to fulfil all the legal prerequisites for being a concessionaire. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Despite not being a novelty, we expect this mechanism will be used more often in the upcoming period by the banks in the maritime domains, beaches and marines. The concessions have proven to be low-risk investments thus far, so the expected increase of investments in the Adriatic will most certainly be followed by an increase of the banking sector. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The New Concessions Law does not provide major novelties with respect to the transfer of the concession itself, which still remains subject to concession provider`s consent. The only addendum to the content is reflected in the legal possibility to transfer the concession through the restructuring procedure. </p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Sub-concessions </h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The obligation to obtain the concession provider`s consent to a sub-concession agreement also remains. Further, in order to amend the existing sub-concession agreement or change the sub-concessionaire, it is also necessary to obtain the concession provider`s consent. The reasons for the exclusion of a potential sub-concessionaire would still apply. </p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">Misdemeanours</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">As expected, the New Concessions Act provides more severe fines for misdemeanours committed with respect to the concessions. It especially focuses on exploitation without the adequate permit or concession agreement. In that respect, the upper limit amounts to HRK 1,000,000 (approximately EUR 133,000), while the director may be fined by up to HRK 20,000 (approximately EUR 6,600). There is also a number of other determined misdemeanours, with the highest prescribed monetary fine of HRK 500,000 (approximately EUR 66,000).</p><h3 style="text-align:justify;">Expectations </h3><p style="text-align:justify;">It is safe to say that the New Concessions Act did not bring any vital changes to the procedure, but only administrative relief - which always represents good news. However, when we talk about concessions related to beaches and marinas, we face another problem – the maritime domain. It is important to note that all maritime domains which could potentially be subject to concessions are not registered with the competent land registries, and their limits are not yet determined in all of the Croatian counties. Without a step forward in the right direction on that front, Croatia will not see as much development as may be expected. However, as investments increase, we expect that the local municipalities and counties will take the lead in this process. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">For further information on this subject, please write to <a href="mailto:info@karanovic-nikolic.com">info@karanovic-nikolic.com</a>.</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><span class="ms-rteStyle-Quote"><em>The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em> </span></p>
The Untapped Potential of South Eastern Europe The Untapped Potential of South Eastern Europe | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/09/The-Untapped-Potential-of-South-Eastern-Europe.aspxThe Untapped Potential of South Eastern Europe The Untapped Potential of South Eastern Europe | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#14/09/2017<p style="text-align:justify;">We have seen emerging markets in Central and Eastern Europe opening up and developing quite quickly. Some of them have done so through their ascension to the European Union, and others by organising their legislation in accordance with European standards, opening up borders, having foreign investors come in, as well as putting in place free trade agreements and investment incentives.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Of course, transitional economies traditionally have a lot to offer to foreign investors. Some of the benefits include less competition and less mature and saturated markets. Usually, these are consumer markets in need of products and services that are not there yet. Or that are just too sparsely available and at unsuitable levels of sophistication. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The countries of South Eastern Europe, with their singular economic infrastructure, and with a number of state-owned companies ready to be privatised, remain highly attractive for foreign investments tired of more mature European markets. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Foreign investors in the countries of this region have the possibility of owning a 100% interest in a company, options of employing foreign citizens and open bank accounts in domestic and foreign currencies. This, along with and estimated regional GDP growth of 3% per annum until 2020, and positive forecasts and rankings in the <a href="http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings">Doing Business reports</a>, encourage further investments in Western Balkan countries.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">For local companies, this means turning towards new markets that are outside of their countries. It is an incentive for local manufacturers, service providers or financial institutions to go beyond their home markets. On the other hand, foreign investors and investments create new jobs, raise the standard of living and the purchasing power of the population, as well as increase the competitiveness of local players. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">However, there is a certain transitional period, during which the rules are not yet firmly established. For example, when the local legislation is not harmonised with EU laws. There is also a vacuum in terms of institutions – especially courts – that are not able to apply the same standards or the same expertise or professionalism than in other countries such as for instance those in the EU are in a position to offer.</p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">A Learning Curve in doing Business</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">When it comes to transitional economies, the local way of doing business is usually different to the established way in more mature markets. However, it is a learning process on both ends. Locally, you have to get used to different standards and methods, as well as different compliance rules. This was a problem in Ukraine, for instance: how to deal with the Western, standardised compliance rules that were previously unknown off in that country. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">There is also a learning curve for investors. Obviously, they have to do a lot of research about a country before investing or entering a new market. Getting accepted by local communities is something for which one cannot prepare easily – surprises might happen. But, in the end, it is beneficial for both ends.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Southeast European markets hold a lot of appeal, from a global perspective. They are quite diverse, but all are opportune. The Slovenian market is more adapted to Western standards, since Slovenia has been a member of the European Union for a number of years now. The country has very close ties to other Western economies. Traditionally, there is a lot of interaction with a number of its surrounding countries – Austria, Italy and Hungary to a certain extent. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">On the other hand, Serbia is still seen as standing aside in relation to the European market. Smaller markets such as Bosnia Herzegovina, Macedonia or Montenegro are very much untapped markets with fast development potential. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The Balkans draw investors from around the world, especially from the EU, Turkey, Russia and China. On their part, the countries of that region further foster a friendly environment for foreign investors through tax reforms and various incentives.</p><h2 style="text-align:justify;">A Foothold into Europe</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">One of the more appealing characteristics of South Eastern Europe, especially when compared to Central and Eastern Europe, is that it is still very much untapped. Looking at the events in the past 20 years, we can definitely see the same pattern being duplicated in South Eastern Europe. Particularly in markets such as Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina. These are markets that offer huge opportunities and that still have a number of regulations a bit weaker, or more flexible than in the EU. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">For instance, Macedonia is 10<sup>th</sup> on the World Bank's Doing Business List. The GDP is expected to exceed 3.3% in 2018, due to higher domestic demand, and public and foreign investments. And, Macedonia's "One-Stop-Shop" system enables investors to register their businesses four hours after the application submission – ranking it number four globally in the Starting Business category.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">With a 15% income tax, <a href="http://ras.gov.rs/invest-in-serbia/why-serbia">Serbia</a> has one of the most favourable corporate income taxes in the wider region. The country signed free trade agreements to markets counting 1.1 billion people – the EU, Customs Union (Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belorussia), Turkey, CEFTA, and others. I see Serbia as a good gateway for Chinese and other overseas investments into the rest of Europe. For example, the 10 billion euro-worth "Belt and Road" infrastructure project in one of such initiatives that will greatly improve communications and increase Chinese presence in Europe and Asia.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Clearly, the existing historic relations and numerous trade agreements set the stage for positive opportunities. In a certain sense, through these markets, despite some of them not being a part of the EU yet, one can definitely get a firm foothold into the rest of Europe.</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not reflect the view of any other partner of or any other person associated with Karanović & Nikolić. This document is not, and should not be regarded as investment or legal advice or as a recommendation regarding any particular course of action.</em></p>
The Buzz in Serbia: CEE Legal Matters Interview with Darko Jovanović The Buzz in Serbia: CEE Legal Matters Interview with Darko Jovanović | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/08/The-Buzz-in-Serbia-CEE-Legal-Matters-Interview-with-Darko-Jovanović.aspxThe Buzz in Serbia: CEE Legal Matters Interview with Darko Jovanović The Buzz in Serbia: CEE Legal Matters Interview with Darko Jovanović | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#24/08/2017<p style="text-align:justify;">The interview with Darko Jovanović was published in August 2017, by CEE Legal Matters. To see the original article, please follow this <a href="http://ceelegalmatters.com/index.php/serbia/6948-the-buzz-in-serbia-interview-with-darko-jovanovic-of-karanovic-nikolic">link</a>.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Karanović & Nikolić Partner Darko Jovanović is upbeat. "Serbia is once again a hotspot in the region," he says, "this time not for unpleasant reasons, but for its economic recovery."</p><p style="text-align:justify;">According to Jovanović, "the previous and current government made significant moves forward in terms of financial consolidation — tightening and cuts to loose ends of the public deficit — to increase the attractiveness of the country to FDI." Jovanović refers, among other things, to an investment incentives scheme adopted by the Republic of Serbia, and says that, "as a result of the concerted efforts of the government, the IMF is projecting that the country's deficit will shrink to 1.1 % of GDP." </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Jovanović also refers positively to a recent Western Balkan Summit in Trieste, where "it was decided to create a Regional Economic Area, consolidating markets of some 20 million people — Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Bosnia, and Kosovo. A transport community treaty was also signed, which should make transport more efficient and facilitate the transfer of goods. Also good is that there is a higher commitment by European banks that attended the meeting, and they committed to investing 3.5 billion euros in that Regional Economic Area, out of which 50% will be committed to Serbia exclusively."</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Jovanović reports "high activity on the infrastructure side, predominantly on the basis of highway construction projects with Chinese construction firms." He says, "there will be a new railway built between Belgrade and Budapest, in large as the result of the good cooperation between two countries, plus Hungary's overall commitment to Serbian investments, which also includes the recent acquisition by Hungary's OTP bank of the Serbian NGB subsidiary." According to Jovanović, "this railway will fit within that context."</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Similarly, he says, "we were delighted to come to the end of the first/epic PPP project in Serbia — a waste treatment project in Vinča, Belgrade — which is now in the final phase of awarding the project on the basis of Serbia's PPP/Procurement legislation." In addition, he reports, "a new and even bigger concession has been announced for the Belgrade airport expansion." The project has created "huge interest" in foreign investors, Jovanović says, including Vinci, from France, Inchon Airport from Seoul, GMR (which operates New Delhi airport), and HNA, from China, which Karanović & Nikolić is advising on the process. "The decision should be made in the next two months, he says, and the process is expected to result not only in a good concession fee to the government but also in improvements and expansions to the current airport.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">"And we're expecting to see several large privatisations as well," he says, "including several agriculture companies and the Bor mining and smelting complex." According to Jovanović, "if the government manages to sell it — probably to either Chinese or Russian investors — we would see further financial consolidation, as currently it's losing money, so it would need to be improved first before it becomes profitable."</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> "Real Estate is booming," Jovanović says, "primarily because of Israeli investments, but also because of South African REITs that have come and bought two largest shopping malls in Belgrade." He says new residential complexes and new office parks are popping up regularly, and he describes a notable development on the Belgrade waterfront. "At the end of the day," he says, "there are a number of very good things happening in Serbian real estate, influenced to some extent by the relaxation of certain procedures for issuing construction permits."</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The banking sector in Serbia is consolidating, Jovanović reports, with several banks exiting the market and others expected to follow in the next few months. "But the sector is not shrinking," he says, "because their assets are being taken over by existing banks (such as OTP and Societe Generale) or by new banking players (such as Direktna Bank and RiverStyxxInvestments). He says the first wave of NPL transactions is more or less over in Serbia, "but we're now starting to see more secondary sales of those portfolios."</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Finally, Jovanović reports that there are ongoing discussions about amending the Serbian Constitution, "If these amendments happen, other legislative shaping may be expected as well." </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Notwithstanding possible amendments to the Constitution, Jovanović says changes to the country's Company Law are being considered, as are changes to the PPP/Concession Law, which will l be changed to fix some of the practical problems that arose in recent projects. "We also expect to see changes in the Law on Capital Markets, which are still relatively weak in Serbia," he says, as well as "changes to the foreign exchange regulations, as well as to the Public Procurement law, which also needs to be reshaped." According to Jovanović, "at the end of the day all these changes should have the same goal: To improve the market to attract domestic and foreign investors."</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Ultimately, Jovanović says that he's optimistic about the state of things in Serbia, though he cautions that political and other developments across CEE may affect the country's progress. "As always, lots of things in the region are moving into right direction," he says, "and currently forecasts look very good."​</p><p style="text-align:justify;"> </p><p style="text-align:justify;"><br></p><p style="text-align:justify;"><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></p><p style="text-align:justify;">​</p>
The Third Energy Package – What the Macedonian Electricity Market Needs? The Third Energy Package – What the Macedonian Electricity Market Needs? | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/07/The-Third-Energy-Package–What-the-Macedonian-Electricity-Market-Needs.aspxThe Third Energy Package – What the Macedonian Electricity Market Needs? The Third Energy Package – What the Macedonian Electricity Market Needs? | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#18/07/2017<p><span style="font-family:"times new roman", georgia, serif;font-size:1rem;">Two and a half years after the expiry of the deadline for the implementation of the Third Energy Package, the Macedonian authorities seem eager to finalise this process in the near future. The new draft legislation has been i</span><span style="font-family:"times new roman", georgia, serif;font-size:1rem;">n the pipeline for quite some time, but until now its adoption was postponed due to different reasons. From recent meetings between the delegation of the Energy Community and the representatives of the new <a href="http://www.vlada.mk/?language=en-gb">Government of the Republic of Macedonia</a>, it appears that the officials set up an agenda for overcoming the</span><em style="font-family:"times new roman", georgia, serif;font-size:1rem;"> status quo</em><span style="font-family:"times new roman", georgia, serif;font-size:1rem;">.</span><br></p><p>During the process for transposing the Third Energy Package into national legislation, the main focus will have to be put on the requirements for unbundling, market opening, regional market integration and strengthening the position of the Energy Regulatory Commission ("<strong>ERC</strong>"). The most challenging issue which needs to be tackled is certainly the postponement of the electricity market liberalisation.</p><h2>Unbundling </h2><p>The Macedonian electricity market consists of the following three key players:</p><ul><li>the state-owned <strong><em></em></strong><a href="http://www.mepso.com.mk/en-us/">Electricity Transmission System Operator of Macedonia (MEPSO)</a> (<em>Macedonian</em>: <em>Македонски електропреносен систем оператор)</em>, acting as a transmission system operator and as a market operator;</li><li>the<em> </em>state-owned <strong><em></em></strong><a href="http://www.elem.com.mk/?lang=en">Macedonian Power Plants (ELEM)</a><em> </em>(<em>Macedonian</em>: <em>Електрани на Македонија</em><em>)</em>, the biggest domestic electricity producer and an operator with a limited distribution network; and, </li><li><strong><a href="https://evn.mk/">EVN Makedonija​​​​​​</a></strong>, a private company which owns and operates most of the distribution network (i.e. 99.38%).</li></ul><p>In line with the provisions from the Second Energy Package, MEPSO has been legally unbundled for quite some time, whereas ELEM and EVN Makedonija are not compliant with the applicable unbundling requirements. In particular, both companies hold supply licences and do not keep separate financial accounts for each of their regulated activities. According to the latest Annual Implementation Report prepared by the Energy Community Secretariat, EVN Makedonija undertook several steps to rectify this situation, however a functional unbundling was not reached. </p><p>The revised electricity legislation intended to transpose the Third Energy Package will have to introduce rules for ownership unbundling and the certification of the transmission system operator. According to recent news, the draft certification rules have been finalised, but their adoption will come after the amendments to the primary energy legislation. The authorities will also need to ensure the implementation of the legal and functional unbundling of the distribution system operators, EVN and ELEM.</p><h2>Market opening and Eligibility </h2><p>In 2014, a few months before the scheduled full liberalisation of the electricity market, the Government decided to postpone it until the 1<sup>st</sup> of July, 2020. The liberalisation process should now happen in several stages i.e. each year a certain group of consumers will become eligible to choose its electricity supplier. For instance, non-households (having less than 50 employees and annual turnover below EUR 10 million) with electricity consumption over 100 MWh will enter the open market on the 1<sup>st</sup> of July, 2018, while those with electricity consumption over 25 MWh on the 1<sup>st</sup> of July, 2019. The households and the rest of the non-households will be eligible from the 1<sup>st</sup> of July, 2020.</p><p>The liberalisation was postponed in order to prevent shock prices, especially in the case of households. Now, on the one hand, according to an announcement, this breach of the Treaty establishing the Energy Community will be rectified. But on the other hand, the Government plans to introduce a daily tariff for cheap electricity, which needs to be carefully structured in order to avoid any further non-compliance with the Energy Community acquis. The Third Energy Package allows for such temporary measures, but they must focus on the socially vulnerable population and not be burdensome for the other electricity consumers. </p><p>Another obstacle to the establishment of a well-functioning electricity market are the public service obligations imposed on EVN and ELEM. On one side, EVN carries out a supply of last resort, while ELEM generates electricity to meet the demands of the suppliers of last resort, and sells the electricity at regulated prices. As noted by the Energy Community, these public service obligations represent a breach of the Third Energy Package - since they are excessive and without time limitation.</p><h2>Regulatory Independence and Powers</h2><p>All requirements from the Third Energy Package, with respect to the national regulatory authorities, aim to ensure an independent and autonomous decision-making process. To reach this goal, the regulatory authority should be independent from any public or private party, it should have a separate annual budget and sufficient human and financial resources for exercising its powers. </p><p>The national legislation satisfies the Third Energy Package independence requirements, with respect to the ERC, except for the lack of a rotation scheme for ERC board members. Hence, the announced amendments need to focus on this issue and on transposing all of the regulatory powers from the Third Energy Package.</p><p><br></p><p>​ </p><p><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></p><p> </p><p>​</p>
The New Montenegrin Law on Prohibited Advertising The New Montenegrin Law on Prohibited Advertising | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/06/14/The-New-Montenegrin-Law-on-Prohibited-Advertising.aspxThe New Montenegrin Law on Prohibited Advertising The New Montenegrin Law on Prohibited Advertising | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#14/06/2017<p>On the 27<sup class="ms-rteFontSize-1">th</sup> of April, 2017, Montenegro introduced the new Law on Prohibited Advertising ("<strong>Law</strong>"), <span class="ms-rteFontSize-2">which </span>came into force on the 17<sup class="ms-rteFontSize-1">th</sup> of May, 2017. This Law represents a new piece of Montenegrin legislation deriving from the process of harmonising the local law with the EU Directive 2006/114/EZ about misleading and comparative advertising. </p><p>Its aim is to protect traders and consumers from prohibited advertising. Since the consumers have already been protected from prohibited advertising through the Law on Consumer Protection, the primary focus of the new Law is to provide traders with adequate protection in relation to their competitors (<em>business to business</em>).</p><h3>What is Prohibited Advertising?</h3><p>Advertising is defined as the production of a representation which recommends the advertiser, its professional or business activity, in order to promote the supply of goods, services and immovable property. The Law explicitly prohibits:</p><ol><li><strong>Misleading advertising</strong> - any advertising, including the manner of presentation of the advertiser, which deceives, or is likely to deceive, the persons to whom it is addressed and might affect their inadequate economic behaviour or injures or is likely to injure the interests of competitors; and,</li><li><strong>Comparative advertising</strong> - any advertising which directly or indirectly refers to a competitor or goods and services offered by a competitor. </li></ol><p>However, comparative advertising shall be permitted when the following conditions are met:</p><ul><li>it is not misleading within the meaning of the Law and the Law on Consumer Protection;</li><li>it compares goods or services meeting the same needs, or intended for the same purpose;</li><li>it objectively compares one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative features of those goods and services, including the price;</li><li>it does not discredit or denigrate the trademarks, trade names, other distinguishing marks, goods, services, activities or relations between competitors;</li><li>in the case of products with a designation of origin, it relates in each case to products with the same designation;</li><li>it does not take an unfair advantage of the reputation of a trademark, trade name or other distinguishing marks of a competitor, or of the designation of origin of competing products;</li><li>it does not present goods or services as imitations of goods or services bearing a protected trademark or trade name; and,</li><li>it does not create confusion among traders, between the advertiser and a competitor, or between the advertiser's trademarks, trade names, other distinguishing marks, goods or services and those of a competitor.</li></ul><p>The trader who performs advertising shall be responsible for misleading and comparative advertising ("<em>prohibited advertising</em>").</p><h3> Protection from Prohibited Advertising</h3><p>The lawsuit for the cessation of prohibited advertising can be filed by: </p><ol><li>chambers and interest trade associations; and, </li><li>an organisation for consumer protection (authorised to file a lawsuit for the protection of collective consumer interests). </li></ol><p>When Montenegro enters the European Union, authorised persons from the EU will be able to initiate the procedure for the protection from prohibited advertising which affects or is likely to affect the traders from EU member states. In order to do this they need to: </p><ul><li>be authorised to initiate the procedure for the collective protection of traders from prohibited advertising in their EU member state; and, </li><li>they have to submit relevant evidence accordingly. </li></ul><p>The lawsuit is filed against a particular trader, or a group of traders from the same economic sector, that uses or encourages the same or similar prohibited advertising, or a holder of the codex stipulating rules that encourage such advertising.</p><p>If the lawsuit is well-grounded, the court will order the cessation of prohibited advertising and the prohibition against its repetition in the future. The court will also potentially order the defendant to publish the entirety or a part of the decision at its own expense and correct such advertising.</p><p>The court decision upholding the lawsuit creates an obligation for the defendant to refrain from the same or similar prohibited advertising even towards other traders who did not participate in the court procedure.</p><p>However, since this Law is the result of obligations that Montenegro has in the course of its negotiations for entering the EU, and because it is a new and specific regulation directed exclusively towards prohibited advertising, it remains to be seen what effect it will produce in practice.</p><p>Should you have any questions or concerns, do not hesitate to contact us:</p><p><a href="mailto:Marjan.Poljak@karanovic-nikolic.com">Marjan.Poljak@karanovic-nikolic.com</a></p><p><a href="mailto:Milena.Roncevic@karanovic-nikolic.com">Milena.Roncevic@karanovic-nikolic.com</a></p><p><a href="mailto:Milica.Filipovic@karanovic-nikolic.com">Milica.Filipovic@karanovic-nikolic.com</a></p><p><a href="mailto:Sonja.Guzina@karanovic-nikolic.com">Sonja.Guzina@karanovic-nikolic.com</a></p><p> </p><p><span class="ms-rteStyle-Quote"><em>The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em> </span></p>
The Macedonian Gasification Saga The Macedonian Gasification Saga | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/06/07/The-Macedonian-Gasification-Saga.aspxThe Macedonian Gasification Saga The Macedonian Gasification Saga | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#07/06/2017<p>The Macedonian energy market is currently mainly focused on the country's gasification project, despite the lack of movements or developments in the energy sector and legislation this past year.</p><p>In fact, some time passed since there was any tangible evidence regarding the gasification of Macedonia, which missed the deadline for the transposition of the Third Energy Package by more than two years. </p><p>Nevertheless, it is important to provide a short breakdown of current, ongoing activities regarding the Macedonian gasification process, which is considered the country's main energy focus at the moment.</p><h2>The Štip – Negotino Section</h2><p>The construction of a new gas network from Štip to Negotino started in August 2016, and it's being carried out by a Macedonian consortium of 5 companies. The new investment of EUR 16 million in the network will allow it to be 36km long. It will connect to the Klečovce – Štip network, which is 61km long and was completed in June 2016. This construction is expected to finish by the end of 2017.</p><p>Besides this section, the following ones are being built:</p><ul><li>Negotino – Prilep – Bitola; and</li><li>Skopje – Tetovo – Gostivar,</li></ul><p>This construction work started at the beginning of this year and is expected to be finalised sometime during 2019. The completion of these two segments will conclude the first phase of the gasification of Macedonia.</p><h2>Gasification of Cities Prolonged While Tendering Continues</h2><p>Three years ago, after the publication of a notice for construction of a 250km long distribution network in Skopje, in the inhabited areas of the western and eastern region, the <a href="http://www.vlada.mk/">Macedonian Government</a> annulled the resolutions by which it was seeking companies for the financing, construction and management of the network.</p><p>The Government then stated that they are looking into new resolutions in relation to the procedures for the construction of the distribution of the natural gas network for all three regions. Estimates for the project (the gasification of all 80 municipalities in Macedonia) amount to an 800km long network, approximated at EUR 250 million.</p><p>Now in 2017, while the construction of the Negotino – Prilep – Bitola and Skopje – Tetovo – Gostivar sections is developing, the Government published new tenders for a secondary and a tertiary gas network for the gasification of Skopje, as well as the Eastern and Western regions of the country. This is a call for a public-private partnership – and while similar (unsuccessful) calls have been published in the past, the new and improved conditions might provide a successful resolution to the lingering issue that is gasification. Specifically, the duration of the concession is extended to 30 years (previously being 20 years), while government subsidies regarding connection to the system are lower by 20%. Other technical improvements were also announced. The project has an estimated value of 150 million euros.</p><p>According to government sources, expectations are that the primary gasification system will be complete by 2020, while 70% of the entire country's gasification will be done by 2022.</p><p> </p><p><span class="ms-rteStyle-Quote"><em>The information in this document does not constitute legal advice on any particular matter and is provided for general informational purposes only.</em></span></p><p>​</p>
The Ministry of Finance Issued New VAT Rulebooks and Prescribed Arm’s Length Interest Rates for 2017 The Ministry of Finance Issued New VAT Rulebooks and Prescribed Arm’s Length Interest Rates for 2017 | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/04/26/The-Ministry-of-Finance-Issued-New-VAT-Rulebooks-and-Prescribed-Arm’s-Length-Interest-Rates-for-2017.aspxThe Ministry of Finance Issued New VAT Rulebooks and Prescribed Arm’s Length Interest Rates for 2017 The Ministry of Finance Issued New VAT Rulebooks and Prescribed Arm’s Length Interest Rates for 2017 | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#26/04/2017<p>​The Ministry of Finance was rather busy releasing VAT rulebooks with the purpose of further clarifying new rules in place for the supply of services introduced by recent <a href="/knviews/Pages/2017/01/18/Serbian-Parliament-adopts-changes-to-Tax-Laws.aspx"><span style="text-decoration:underline;">amendments to the VAT Law</span></a>.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The <em>Arm's length</em> interest rates for loans in euros and dinars have decreased, while rates for loans in Suisse francs and US dollars have slightly increased.</p><h2>VAT Treatment of Supplies Related to Real Estate</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The new rulebook on the services provided in connection with real estate gives a list of services which are deemed to be related to real estate, and therefore subject to the Serbian VAT - if the relevant real estate is located in Serbia. Listed services are subject to VAT irrespective of whether they are provided to a resident or to a non-resident. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">Some of the listed services are commonly considered to be related to real estate matters (land surveying, construction, supervision of construction, lease etc.). However, the list also contains services which were regarded as consulting services before VAT Law amendments (e.g. assessment of the characteristics of immovable property for the purpose of assessing energy efficiency), or services related to works on movable property (e.g. installation or maintenance of the equipment that was installed in the facility as its inseparable part).</p><p style="text-align:justify;">Legal services, such as the drafting of construction agreements, the sale or lease of real estate located in Serbia, are also deemed to be services provided in connection with real estate - and thus subject to Serbian VAT, if the real estate is located in Serbia. On the other hand, legal advisory and tax advisory services in relation to real estate are not deemed to be related to real estate from the VAT perspective, and these services will be subject to VAT only if they are provided to a Serbian service recipient. </p><h2>VAT Exemptions for Transportation Services</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The new rules in place for supply also affect transportation services. The amendments to the rulebook on VAT exemptions were issued in order to clarify the VAT exemption procedure for transportation services relating to import, export, and the transit of goods, and they are aligned with the new rules in place for supply. </p><p style="text-align:justify;">The place of supply for transportation services is generally the registered seat of the service recipient. The VAT exemption is prescribed for service fees related to the transport of imported goods from foreign countries to the first delivery place in Serbia, instead of service fees for the transport from the border to the first delivery place. In connection to the export of goods, the fee for transport from a Serbian loading point to a foreign country is exempted, instead of the fee for transport to the Serbian border.</p><p style="text-align:justify;">The new rules will simplify the administration of the VAT for transport services.</p><h2>Arm's length Interest Rates for 2017</h2><p style="text-align:justify;">The new <em>arm's length</em> interest rates for loans provided to Serbian companies, or by Serbian companies, are as follows:</p><ol><li>6.46% for short term loans in RSD,</li><li>6.39% for long term loans in RSD,</li><li>3.98% for short term loans in EUR,</li><li>4.25% for long term loans in EUR,</li><li>7.08% for long term loans in CHF,</li><li>4.61% for short term loans in USD,</li><li>5.72% for long term loans in USD. </li></ol><p style="text-align:justify;">The interest rates are applicable for the purpose of determining the deductibility of interest expenses, as well as for the attribution of interest income for tax purposes in the year 2017.</p><p><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">Information provided in this document does not represent any legal advice, or advice of any kind with respect to certain matter, but is intended for general informative purpose only.</em></p>
New European Data Protection Regulation New European Data Protection Regulation | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/04/04/New-European-Data-Protection-Regulation.aspxNew European Data Protection Regulation New European Data Protection Regulation | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#04/04/2017<p>​With the last Directive on Data Protection (Directive 95/46/EC; the "Directive") adopted in 1995 and in light of the rapid and vast technological developments since then, the EU has been aware for quite some time now that a new data protection legal framework is needed. With the ongoing debates on this topic in the EU bodies that started back in January 2012, the new General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679; the "Regulation") was finally adopted in April 2016, and will come into effect on the 25<sup>th</sup> of May, 2018.</p><p>The Regulation will repeal the Directive, which provided guidelines for the regulation of data protection across the EU and urged Member States to adopt national legislative acts. In the end it showed that the determination of general principles and objectives, which was pursued with the Directive, was not sufficient as it did not prevent Member States to implement the Directive in different ways, eventually leading to disunity of data protection rules across the EU and generating legal uncertainty. A diversity of regulatory frameworks in EU Member States presented a considerable disadvantage to all companies wishing to enter into the markets of various Member States, which led to distortion of competition and had a negative impact on competitiveness of the EU economy as a whole.</p><p>The scope of the Regulation is much broader than referring only to the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data. Its main objective is to ensure the free movement of personal data, not only within the EU, but also to third countries and international organisations, and to allow both private companies and public authorities to make use of such personal data, all while ensuring a high level of protection.</p><p>Presented below are the main novelties introduced by the Regulation that are expected to bring these aspirations to life:</p><h3>1.        Expanded territorial scope</h3><p>The Regulation redefines the territorial scope of the data protection framework, as the main focus is now switched from the controllers and the location of their establishments or equipment used for data processing to subjects who are in the EU.</p><p>Pursuant to the Directive, the national law applies in cases where processing is carried out in the context of the activities of an establishment of the controller on the territory of the Member State. Consequently, the controllers with establishments on the territory of several Member States had to ensure compliance of each establishment with the national law of the respective Member State. National law also applied to the controllers using data processing equipment, which was located within EU.</p><p>On the contrary, the Regulation is not only applicable for the processing of data carried out in the context of the activities of the controller or processor having its seat within EU, but also for the processing of data of all subjects who are in the EU, even if the seat of the controller or processor is outside the EU. This is under the condition that processing relates either to (i) the offering of goods or services to such subjects in the EU, or (ii) the monitoring of their behaviour (as far as their behaviour takes place within the EU).</p><h3>2.         Reinforced consent requirements</h3><p>The Regulation states, in more detail than the Directive, that an informed, voluntary, explicit and unambiguous consent of the data subject for processing of data has to be given, either in the form of a statement or other "<em>clear affirmative act</em>". Consequently, silence or any other inactivity cannot be interpreted as consent, which has to be given by a written or oral statement or other conduct clearly indicating subject's consent (such as ticking a box when visiting a website or choosing technical settings). Ultimately, the controller has to be able to prove that consent has been given. In order to be able to give an informed statement, the subject has to know, at the very least, the identity of the controller and the purpose of data processing.</p><p>The Regulation is also stricter when it comes to the question of voluntariness of consent. Consent will be deemed involuntary if the subject had no choice or if he or she could not refuse or revoke the consent without any detriment. In cases where the performance of the contract is conditional upon given consent, even though the consent is not necessary for the performance, such consent will also be deemed involuntary. What is more, the consent will not be valid when there is an obvious inequality between the data subject and the controller.</p><p>With regard to subjects' consent in particular, Member States will be free to adopt specific regulations on the processing of employees' personal data in the employment context.</p><h3>3.         New data subjects' rights</h3><p>The Regulation expands the right to erasure, which is now also known as "<em>the right to be forgotten</em>", and introduces a new right to data portability. The right to be forgotten bounds the controller to erase data without undue delay upon the subject's request, if personal data is no longer necessary for the purpose of processing, if there is no legal basis for processing (including cases where data subject withdraws his or her consent for processing), if the processing was illegal or if the erasure is required by EU or national law. The right to data portability gives the data subject a right to a direct transmission of data from one controller to another.</p><h3>4.         Data protection officers and other controllers' and processors' obligations</h3><p>For the first time the Regulation imposes direct obligations to data processors. From now on, provided that (i) the processing is carried out by a public authority, (ii) the processing requires regular and systematic monitoring of data subjects, or (iii) the processing refers to large scale of special categories of personal data, every data processor and data controller will have to appoint a data protection officer ("DPO"). Each company within the group of associated companies will have to appoint its own DPO, unless one DPO will be accessible from every company within the group. </p><p>A DPO should be a person with expert knowledge of data protection. A DPO should also be independent, meaning that no instructions may be given to the DPO and that the DPO reports directly to the management body of the controller/processor. The main tasks of the DPOs will include advising and informing the controller/processor, regulatory compliance verification, acting as a contact point for the supervisory authority, etc. Data subjects will be entitled to approach the DPO directly.</p><p>Furthermore, a new obligation has been imposed on organisations acting as controllers or processors, who will have to maintain a record of personal data processing activities. These will include information such as the purpose of processing, the controller's or processor's contact details, the categories of data subjects, personal data and recipients, to whom this data will be disclosed, etc.</p><p>In case of a personal data breach the processor is obliged to notify the controller and the controller is obliged to notify the competent supervisory authority. Data subjects also have to be notified about the breach if it is likely that the breach will result in high risk for their rights and freedoms. </p><h3>5.         Privacy by design and by default</h3><p>Another general obligation was adopted with a view to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Regulation. The controller will have to adopt adequate internal policies and implement measures which will meet the principles of data protection by design and by default. Privacy by design demands from the controller to adopt appropriate measures which will integrate the necessary safeguards for processing in order to meet the requirements of this Regulation and protect the rights of data subjects (such as pseudonymisation, data minimisation, etc.). These measures will have to be adopted not only at the time of processing but also at the time of planning the data processing. Privacy by default, on the other hand, means that the controller has to adopt measures so that only the processing of such data which is necessary for the purpose of processing will be possible.</p><h3>6.         Transfer of personal data outside EU</h3><p>No special permission is required for data transfer to non-EU countries or to international organisations, if the European Commission assesses that the respective country or international organisation provides an adequate level of data protection. When assessing the adequacy, the European Commission takes into consideration first and foremost the standard of human rights protection, the adequacy of the local legislation, and the existence of supervisory bodies and international commitments. Nevertheless, transfer to non-EU countries and international organisations for which the above assessment has not been made is possible, if appropriate safeguards are provided by the controller or the processor and effective legal remedies are available for the data subjects.</p><h3>7.        One-stop-shop</h3><p>The Directive already provided that every Member State has to establish a supervisory authority to monitor data protection regulations. Every supervisory authority is competent for data protection matters on the territory of its own Member State. With a view to the unification of regulation as well as in practice, the Regulation now stipulates that in cases where the controller or processor has establishments in several Member States, the supervisory authority of the main establishment is competent as the lead supervisory authority for the cross-border processing carried out by said controller or processor.</p><h3>8.         New European data protection board</h3><p>The European Data Protection Board (the "Board") will be a new EU body, composed of the head of a supervisory body of each Member State and the European Data Protection Supervisor. Its main task will be to ensure consistent application of the Regulation, which will also be pursued by issuing and publishing opinions, guidelines, recommendations and best practices. Once a year the Board will have to issue an annual report regarding data protection in and outside EU.</p><p>In addition to the consulting function of the Board, it will also have the power of a decision-maker with regard to the activities carried out under the consistency mechanism. When the supervisory authority will wish to adopt certain measures, the Board will have to issue an opinion which will have to be complied by the supervisory authority to the greatest extent possible. In certain disputes, it will be competent to adopt the binding decision.</p><h3>9.         Sanctions and penalties</h3><p>Pursuant to the Directive up until now the Member States determined the nature and level of penalties by themselves. The new Regulation provides administrative fines for certain infringements as well as the level of such fines. The highest level of an administrative fine pursuant to the Regulation is EUR 20 million or, for an undertaking, 4% of their total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Notwithstanding, additional penalties for other infringements may be prescribed by the Member States.</p><h3>A glance to the future</h3><p>Now it is the controllers' and processors' turn. By spring 2018 they have to ensure compliance of data processing under the new Regulation. Unified rules within the EU market and, consequently, unified practices regarding data processing, will make it easier for the companies as they will know what to expect when entering the markets of other Member States. Eliminating yet another administrative impediment will certainly facilitate free movement within the EU. On the other hand, data subjects will also benefit as they will now know what level of security can be anticipated in each and every one of the Member States.</p><p><span class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">The information in this document is not intended to provide and does not constitute legal or any other advice on any particular matter and is provided for general information purposes only.</span></p><p><em><em></em></em> </p><p><em><em>Slovenian version:</em></em></p>
Serbian Parliament adopts changes to Tax Laws Serbian Parliament adopts changes to Tax Laws | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2017/01/18/Serbian-Parliament-adopts-changes-to-Tax-Laws.aspxSerbian Parliament adopts changes to Tax Laws Serbian Parliament adopts changes to Tax Laws | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#18/01/2017<p>At the end of 2016 the Serbian Parliament adopted changes to Serbian tax laws, introducing a number of important changes in the area of VAT, excise duties and general tax procedures. Amendments to the laws governing these areas were adopted at the very end of 2016 – on the 28<sup>th</sup> of December 2016.</p><p>In addition to the changes made regarding tax laws, some important changes have been made in the area of criminal prosecution of tax avoidance through amendments to the Serbian Criminal Code. </p><p>A number of new double tax treaties will start to apply in 2017. The Serbian Ministry of Finance issued an important opinion concerning taxation of on-line advertising services.  </p><h2>Amendments to VAT law</h2><p>The most important changes introduced by the latest amendments to the VAT law concern the obligation of foreign suppliers to register for VAT in Serbia, and the place of supply rules which have been remodelled completely. </p><p>The VAT Law now prescribes that foreign suppliers are required to register for VAT in Serbia and appoint their VAT representative only if they make taxable supplies in Serbia to non-taxable persons. In another words, the obligation to register for VAT now exists only if a taxable supply is made to a person who cannot reemit VAT. In this case the obligation applies irrespectively of the amount of annual turnover of the foreign supplier – thresholds for mandatory registration which apply to resident taxpayers (RSD 8 million) do not apply to foreign suppliers. </p><p>Failure to register for VAT by a foreign supplier is sanctioned as a misdemeanour punishable by a fine of up to RSD 2 million (app. EUR 18k). </p><p>Another important change introduced by the latest VAT amendments is the complete remodelling of the rules governing the place of supply of services. The purpose of these changes was to align Serbian place of supply rules with EU rules in this area. </p><p>The general place of supply rule now depends on whether a service is supplied to a taxable or to a non-taxable person: if the service is supplied to a taxable person, the place of supply is the place where the recipient of the service is established. If the service is supplied to a non-taxable person, the place of supply is the place where the supplier of the service is established. </p><p>This is the general rule. There are a number of exceptions prescribed for specific types of services. Services such as consulting, services supplied electronically, telecommunication services and other services listed in the law are deemed to be supplied where the recipient of the service is established, regardless of whether the recipient of the service is a non-taxable person. Services related to immovable property are deemed supplied where the property is located. Services concerning cultural, entertainment and sport events are deemed to be supplied in the place where the service was actually provided. </p><p>The amendments introduce a specific definition of the taxable person which applies only for the purpose of application of the place of supply rules. There are two different definitions for situations where a service is supplied by a Serbian supplier: if the service is supplied to a foreign customer, such foreign customer will be deemed to be a taxable person if the customer is registered for a consumption tax in the country of the customer's registered seat. If a service is supplied by a foreign supplier to a Serbian customer, than the Serbian customer will be deemed a taxable person for the purpose of place of supply rules if they conduct a business activity on a permanent basis irrespective of the purpose of such business activity. </p><p>Overall, it seems that the new place of supply rules, coupled with the introduction of mandatory registration of foreign suppliers for VAT will make the assessment of VAT on cross-border supplies much more complicated then under the old rules. </p><p>Other changes introduced by the latest amendments include abolishment of the refund of VAT for babies (food and equipment), which will be replaced by direct subsidies to families with children. </p><p>Rules governing the time of supply of electricity, natural gas and heat have been slightly refined and clarified.</p><p>The supply of wooden briquettes and pallets is now included in the list of supplies subject to the reduced 10% rate.</p><p>Finally, the application of the obligation of registered VAT payers to submit the report on the calculation of VAT is postponed until 2018. </p><p>New VAT rules started on the 1<sup>st</sup> of January 2017, except for rules governing place of supply of services which will start to apply on the 1<sup>st</sup> of April 2017.</p><h2>Tax procedure</h2><p>The most important change introduced by the latest amendments to the Law on Tax Procedure and Tax Administration is the shifting of the jurisdiction for the appeal process from the Tax Administration to the Ministry of Finance. </p><p>Until now, the power to decide on appeals against resolutions of the Tax Administration was delegated to the Tax Administration. From now on, the Ministry of Finance will decide on the appeals. This is an encouraging change, and we hope that it will bring more independence and justice in the second-instance process. This should also contribute to the greater harmonization of the jurisprudence in tax cases, as the Ministry of Finance is also responsible for the binding opinions on the interpretation of tax laws. </p><p>The amendments introduce the possibility for the Tax Administration to issue its resolutions without hearing, if the resolution may be issued on the basis of the information available in public records. </p><p>The amendments now prescribe that the Tax Administration to refuse to register any given company for tax, if tax registration was denied to its sister company. It is also prescribed, that companies whose tax identification number has been suspended (because of unsettled tax liabilities) will not be allowed to register and execute any corporate changes with the Serbian Business Registry Agency.</p><p>The Ministry of Finance will take over its new responsibilities in the second instance starting from the 1<sup>st</sup> of July 2017. This is the period in which the Ministry should take over competent personnel and prepare itself for this new assignment. All other changes introduced by the amendments started to apply  on the 1<sup>st</sup> of January 2017.</p><h2>Amendments to the excise Tax law</h2><p style="text-align:left;">Changes introduced in excise taxes concern primarily cigarettes and coffee.</p><p>Excise taxes on cigarettes have been increased with an explanation that they should be harmonized with the excise rates in the EU. Currently, the excise tax on cigarettes in Serbia is EUR 54 per 1000 cigarettes, while minimal excise duties in the EU is EUR 90 per 1000 cigarettes.</p><p>Minimal amount of excises will be published twice a year, on the 15<sup>th</sup> of February and the 31<sup>st</sup> of July each year. </p><p>The obligation to pay excise tax on coffee will now include entities involved in the processing, roasting, packaging and other activities carried out for the purpose of coffee production, and not only the importation of coffee, as was the case before. At the same time, the amendments introduced a "mini VAT" system for calculating the excise tax due: each participant in the production chain will have the right to reduce the excise due, proportionate to the amount of excise duties paid to the previous participant in the chain. </p><h2>Facebook's and Google's advertising services are subject to withholding tax in Serbia</h2><p>At the end of December 2016, the Serbian Ministry of Finance issued an opinion which stated that services of internet advertising supplied by Facebook and Google to Serbian corporate customers are subject to withholding tax on service income, at the standard tax rate of 20%.  </p><p>The taxes due may be eliminated on the basis of a double tax treaty, but only if Facebook and Google provide their Serbian customers a certificate of residence by their country of residence (Ireland). Each individual customer must have an original copy of the certificate in their hands to be relieved from the obligation to pay tax. This may be difficult to achieve considering the fact Facebook and Google may have many customers in Serbia. </p><h2>New Double Tax treaties</h2><p>Double tax treaties signed over the course of 2015 and 2016, including the treaty with Luxembourg, Armenia and Korea, started to apply on the 1<sup>st</sup> of January 2017. </p><p>Under the treaty with Armenia, interest, dividends, royalties and lease of industrial equipment is subject to be reduced to an 8% withholding tax rate.</p><p>Under the treaty with Korea, the withholding tax rate on dividends is 5% if the recipient of the dividend holds at least a 25% share in the company paying the dividend, and 10% in all other cases. Interest is subject to 10% and royalties to 5% withholding tax rates. Same withholding tax rates apply under the treaty with Luxembourg</p><p>Under all treaties, capital gains generated from alienation of immovable property and shares in companies whose assets are composed mostly of immoveable assets may be taxed in the country where the immoveable asset is located. Capital gains generated from the sale of other assets may be taxed only in the country of residence of the seller. </p><p>The second round of negotiations between Serbia and Israel on the new double tax treaty was held in Belgrade between the 7<sup>th </sup>and 10<sup>th</sup> of November 2016. All main provisions of the treaty have been agreed upon and it is expected that the treaty will be signed soon. The interesting feature of this treaty is that this will be the first treaty which will be fully harmonized with BEPS's (<em>Base Erosion and Profit Shifting</em>) action plan.</p><h2>Changes in the legal definition of Criminal offence of Tax avoidance</h2><p>On the 23<sup>rd</sup> of November 2016, the Serbian Parliament adopted amendments to the Criminal Code. Changes made include, amongst others, criminal offence of tax avoidance. </p><p>Prosecution of tax avoidance was a matter of much controversy in the recent practice, and some of the changes made by the latest amendments are aimed to address these controversies. Though generally welcome, the scope of changes made are unlikely to bring significant improvements in the prosecution of tax avoidance. </p><p>The first, long awaited change is the increase of the threshold for criminal prosecution of tax avoidance. For more than a decade this threshold was set at only RSD 150,000 (less than EUR 1,500). Such a low threshold allowed criminal investigations of minor cases of failure to pay tax, which were often the result of a mere mistake, rather than an actual intent to avoid tax. At the same time, the low threshold exhausted the resources of both the Tax Police and the Office of the Public Prosecutor who have a legal obligation to investigate all cases which may fall under the legal definition of tax avoidance however small, instead of concentrating on high-profile cases of tax avoidance. </p><p>After much debate and lobbying, the threshold for criminal prosecution of tax evasion was increased by the latest amendments, but only symbolically: from RSD 150,000 to RSD 500,000 (app. EUR 4,000). Such a low threshold may be a part of the Government's strategy to combat grey economies with more rigorous sanctions in 2017. Nevertheless, this is not very likely to contribute to neither the efficiency nor to the fairness in the prosecution of tax evasion. </p><p>The thresholds for the two qualified forms of tax avoidance are not changed and remain at the same level (at RSD 1,500.000 and RSD 7,500.000), </p><p>Another important change is that tax avoidance now also includes avoidance to pay tax on illegally earned income. Before the latest amendments, tax avoidance could have been committed (and prosecuted) only with respect to legally earned income. Cases in which a person avoided to pay tax on illegal income were outside the scope of the legal definition of tax avoidance. The result was that the most blatant cases of tax avoidance could not have been prosecuted (such as for avoidance to pay tax and social contributions on salaries paid to illegal workers and similar). The removal of reference to "legal income" from the legal definition of tax avoidance is a welcomed change which should result in a better and fairer prosecution of tax avoidance. </p><p>Finally, the legal definition of tax avoidance now includes a clear rule whereby this criminal offence may be committed both in cases in which the offender avoids his/her own taxes, as well as in cases in which the offender's intent was aimed at the avoidance of someone else's taxes. </p><p>The sanctions for tax avoidance for the most part remain the same: a fine and imprisonment of six months to five years. Sanctions for the most severe cases of tax avoidance have been slightly increased to a minimum of three years of imprisonment (instead of the previous two). The maximal sentence remains the same – ten years of imprisonment. </p><p>The amendments to the Criminal Code enter into force on the 1<sup>st</sup> of June 2017 whereas the provisions on tax avoidance shall enter into force on the 1<sup>st</sup> of March 2018. </p>
Amendments to the Montenegrin Tax Laws Amendments to the Montenegrin Tax Laws | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2016/10/13/Amendments-to-the-Montenegrin-Tax-Laws.aspxAmendments to the Montenegrin Tax Laws Amendments to the Montenegrin Tax Laws | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#13/10/2016<p>Montenegrin Parliament adopted the amendments to the Corporate Income Tax Law ("<strong>CIT Law</strong>") and Value Added Tax Law ("<strong>VAT Law</strong>"). Below is a brief description of the main amendments.</p><h2>Corporate Income Tax Law</h2><p>The most important change to the CIT Law is the introduction of the obligation for a non-resident tax payer to file the tax return for capital gains it generates in Montenegro. The non-resident will have to file the tax return within 30 days after the income was generated. The tax authorities will assess the tax in their resolution. Until now, capital gains tax was paid on a withholding basis. </p><p>The non-residents will also be obliged to file the tax return for their income from leasing movable and immovable property, if income is derived from a person who is not obliged to withhold and pay withholding tax (e.g. from an individual).</p><p>The list of income types that are subject to withholding tax is expanded. The withholding tax shall be paid on income generated by resident and non-resident individuals from the sales of used products, goods, and agricultural products purchased from the taxpayer who is registered as a VAT payer. Withholding tax shall be paid on the income generated by the non-resident legal entity with respect to entertainment performances, fun, artistic, sporting or similar activities in Montenegro.</p><p>The latest amendments to the CIT Law prescribe that salaries, severance payments at retirement, redundancy payments and payments of the other benefits at termination of employment, are recognised as a tax deductible expense of Montenegrin taxpayers, in the tax period in which the payment was executed. The expenses will not be recognised when they are accrued.</p><p>The impairment expenses will not be recognised for tax purposes. As an exception, the impairment of the value of shares in capital of the company that is in the process of privatisation may be recognised for tax purposes if shares are acquired by a conversion of receivables into the share capital.</p><p>Conditions that the domestic taxpayer has to fulfill in order to deduct expenses of a write-off of receivables for tax purposes are changed. The taxpayer has to demonstrate (i) that receivables were included into the taxable income, (ii) that they are written-off in taxpayer's books, (iii) that the taxpayer filed the suit, or initiated forced collection, or if it claimed unpaid receivables in the liquidation or bankruptcy procedure, and (iv) that the receivable is older than 365 days. Therefore, it is not required that the taxpayer waits for the ending of the litigation process in order to deduct the expense, but it is enough that it initiated the proceedings.</p><p>The list of expenses that are deductible up to the amount of 3.5% of the total income of the taxpayer is now expanded. Besides expenses incurred for healthcare, education, scientific, religious, cultural, sports, environmental and humanitarian purposes, the list now includes expenses made for purposes of protecting persons with disabilities, social care for children and youth, assistance to the elderly, protection and promotion of human and minority rights, the rule of law, civil society and volunteerism, NATO and European integration, art, technical culture, promotion of agriculture and rural development, sustainable development, consumer protection, gender equality, the fight against corruption and organised crime and the fight against addictions. These expenses will be deductible only if they are executed to legal entities and if they are used exclusively for the above mentioned purpose. Expenses shall be deductible for tax purposes if they are made in cash, goods or in rights and services.</p><p>Amendments prescribe that the taxpayer will be fined in the range from EUR 550 euro to EUR 16,500  if he/she calculates the tax contrary to the CIT law. </p><p>The amendments to the CIT Law will be applied starting from 1 January 2017.</p><h2>Value Added Tax Law</h2><p>A whole new spectrum of imported goods which are exempted from VAT such as non-commercial goods which the passengers carry from abroad in prescribed type, value and quantity, items which domestic or foreign citizens permanently residing in Montenegro inherited abroad, goods directly used for museum, archival, restoration, literary, artistic, musical-scene and film activities, based on the opinion of the competent ministry etc.</p><p>As of 1 January 2018 the VAT shall be paid by reduced rate of 7% for services of preparation and serving of food and drinks in hotels with at least four stars in the Northern region, and in hotels with a minimum of five stars in the Central and Coastal region. It seems that consumers could expect lower prices for these kinds of services. </p>
New Minimum Salary and New Branch Collective Agreements New Minimum Salary and New Branch Collective Agreements | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2016/09/29/New-Minimum-Salary-and-New-Branch-Collective-Agreements.aspxNew Minimum Salary and New Branch Collective Agreements New Minimum Salary and New Branch Collective Agreements | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#29/09/2016<p><span class="ms-rteStyle-Quote" style="font-family:"times new roman",serif;font-size:11pt;">*Information provided in this article does not represent any legal or whatsoever advice with respect to certain matter, but is intended for general informative purpose only. </span></p><h2> </h2><h2>New Minimum Salary</h2><p>New minimum salary amount has been adopted at the state level and set to RSD 130.00 net per working hour (approx. EUR 1.04 net). The new minimum amount will be in force as of 1 January 2017 until 31  December 2017.<br>All employers need to abide by this new amount and cannot provide employees basic salary that is below this legal minimum.<br>This new amount overrides  previously valid minimum salary that was in force for two last years, in the amount of net RSD 121.00 net per working hour (approx. EUR 0.9 net).</p><h2>New Branch Collective Bargaining Agreements Adopted</h2><p>Recently, several new branch collective bargaining agreements for different industry groups (“CBAs”) have been adopted:</p><ol><li>CBA for Agriculture, Food, Tobacco and Water Management,</li><li>CBA for Construction and Construction Materials Industry, and</li><li>CBA for Chemistry and Non-Metal Industry. </li></ol><p>CBA for Agriculture, Food, Tobacco and Water Management is, for the time being, applicable only to the signatory parties i.e. only to those employers that are members of the Union of Employers of Serbia.<br>As for the other two CBAs, their transitory provisions note that these agreements will apply only after Government enacts a decision on extended applicability of such CBAs to all employers within the respective industry.<br>It still remains to be seen whether the Government will actually render such decision on any of the above CBAs or not.</p><p>If you need additional information regarding the services of our employment department, feel free to contact us at following e-mails:</p><p>Milena Jakšić Papac, Department Lead <br><a href="mailto:milena.papac@karanovic-nikolic.com">milena.papac@karanovic-nikolic.com</a>  <br>Jelena Danilović, Senior Associate<br><a href="mailto:Jelena.danilovic@karanovic-nikolic.com">Jelena.danilovic@karanovic-nikolic.com</a><br></p>
Drawing the Line – Parallel Import Drawing the Line – Parallel Import | Views | Karanović & Nikolić https://www.karanovic-nikolic.com/knviews/Pages/2016/09/14/Drawing-the-Line-–-Parallel-Import.aspxDrawing the Line – Parallel Import Drawing the Line – Parallel Import | Views | Karanović & Nikolić string;#14/09/2016<p><em class="ms-rteStyle-Quote">This article was initially featured in CEE Legal Matters, June 2016 edition.</em></p><p>​The contemporary business world has become fundamentally tied in with the progress of globalisation, and for anyone involved in it, that is no secret. Anybody would be hard pressed to find an industry that can exist and sustain itself in a purely national context, without – at least in some regard – relying on either a piece of legislation or a practice trend that is related to whatever kind of international functioning. A fine illustrative example of such an issue nowadays can be found in the international trade of fast moving consumer goods (and to a lesser extent pharmaceutical products), as well as the ways in which such products find their path to consumers' hands. More precisely, in the ways that products are moved on a cross-border basis, and how such movement corresponds with the respective national intellectual property (IP) protections in place, bringing us to a division between an international exhaustion of IP rights and the national exhaustion of these same rights. It is the presence of the parallel import issue that has sparked a rather controversial debate over which of the two is preferable. </p><p style="text-align:left;">Parallel import - in some circles considered as the premier example of a 'grey' practice – encompasses products that are "genuine" goods (contrary to counterfeit goods), since they have been manufactured by, or for, or under license, from the brand owner. However, they may have been formulated or packaged for a particular jurisdiction, and then are imported into a different jurisdiction from that intended by the brand owner. Deemed as 'grey' for their ambiguity in terms of being either beneficial or detrimental depending on one's legal point of view – be it competition or intellectual property – it goes to show the inherent difficulty in establishing a related universal set of rules. </p><p style="text-align:left;">If we were to look at it from a particular perspective – the one currently employed in Serbia – it should be noted that the relevant regulatory framework was conceived in 2013 when the creed of national exhaustion of rights was initiated. What this doctrine was then meant to entail was that a trademark could entitle its holder to prohibit its use on the goods which were not placed on the Serbian market by the holder of the trademark or any other person directly authorised by the holder. Exclusive distributors were the ones front running this initiative as it was their own efforts that were mainly impeded by the presence of parallel imported products in a variety of contexts, including the "free ride" that parallel importers were getting from the exclusive distributors' advertising activity, which was designed for the sake of boosting their own sales figures. All of this influenced the commercial court in Belgrade to make a decision that would serve as a defining point of legislation in this regard, finally reaching it in April 2015. From this point on, exclusive distributors have had the right to sue those engaged in parallel import activities on the basis of national exhaustion of intellectual property.</p><p style="text-align:left;">On the other hand, the local distributors – feeling wrongly affected by the decision in question – decided to ask the Serbian Commission for the Protection of Competition for an official opinion, claiming that this ruling has in turn put exclusive distributors in an unfairly gained dominant position. The Commission, in presenting its point of view, made it clear that their explanation will be based on what would be the most beneficial situation for the end consumer. Having that in mind, the Commission opined that competition in this case should be split into two kinds a) static competition – the one related to the pricing of products in which parallel imports bring immediate benefits to consumers by making them cheaper; and b) dynamic competition – the one related to how parallel imports hurt the innovation tendencies (i.e. the diversification of their portfolio) on behalf of the trademark holder, in turn causing a long term detrimental effect on the end consumer. Whilst juxtaposing the two effects, the Commission's final opinion – perhaps unsurprisingly so – was that emphasis should be put on balancing them out. Moreover, the Commission emphasised the importance of having every participant in the market – and especially the one with a potentially dominant position – act within the responsibility of not hurting the market's competitiveness. </p><p>Finally, the entire situation does not bring us much closer to reaching a universal stance on the matter, apart from perhaps educating us somewhat further. With Serbia's ascension to the EU looming, and considering all of the regulatory updates made en route to it, it will be very interesting to see how this issue will play out in the coming period, as the above mentioned act of balancing out the two factors threatens to turn more difficult to commit.</p>